There was a story in the New York Times a few days ago about how the “revolution” in Tunisia was sparked in December by the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi, a 26-year-old, befuddled roadside green grocer. Like so many young Arabs, he was born poor and only dreamed of providing for his siblings and his mother. He had been to college, where he studied law, but had found no employment possibilities. So, given the basic dignity often found in people in places like Tunisia, he chose to humble himself and find a halal means to generate some income. But he kept running into problems with the police and government inspectors until the fateful day in December when they confiscated his cart and his produce, saying he didn’t have a proper permit, and leaving him with an unpaid loan with which he’d bought the goods. At the station, upon attempting to reclaim his cart, he was slapped and humiliated publicly. His already deferred dreams had clearly dried up. Bouazizi left an apologetic note for his mother and set himself on fire in front of the local government building.
Four weeks later, the protests sparked by his death brought down the government of President Zine el Abdidine Ben Ali, who’d ruled Tunis with an iron hand for 23 years.
I have had the good fortune of visiting Tunisia many times. During my last visit, which was in the early nineties, I was harassed by the Mukhabarat (secret police), and the family that I was staying with was also questioned. That left a bad taste for me, and I decided not to return to the country and have not been back since.
Mukhabarat notwithstanding, my experience of the Tunisians is that they are wonderful people. They are known among Arabs for being kind and gentle. They are slow to lose their temper and quick to lend a hand to a stranger. I remember seeing young men selling beautiful bundles of jasmine flowers that had such a powerful scent that you could smell a seller coming your way long before he reached you.
Tunisia is a stunningly beautiful country with a great history and a bright and talented people, but corruption, cruelty, and the ineptitude of leaders unable to gauge the frustration of their people has led to the current crisis. Like so many Muslim countries, its government has been run largely by a family operation with a tribal mentality that was milking a population dry.
When the government was brought down this month, President Ben Ali fled with his wife, Leila, to Jeddah of all places; terrible floods in the port city inauspiciously welcomed him. It seems that Jeddah is the choice retirement haven of ex-African Muslim tyrants, including the former dictator Idi Amin of Uganda. Sometimes, birds of prey flock together in unlikely places. No doubt, Ben Ali has millions, if not billions, of dollars in his Swiss accounts, but even Europe, despite its dire need of cash, didn’t want him. Options diminish quickly for these men once they’re out of political power, but where odiousness closes doors in some places, great wealth obviously opens them in others.
The irony is that such tyrants usually rise to power because the people want to get rid of tyranny from a previous source. Years ago, I was in the house of the great Tunisian scholar, Shaykh Shadhili Nayfar, who was from a proud Andalusian family that had fled to Tunis with the collapse of Muslim Spain. Shaykh Shadhili had been the dean at al-Zaytuna University, one of the oldest and most prestigious universities in the world. He studied rare manuscripts and had a great library in his home that researchers could use. Since he was a former Member of Parliament in Tunisia, I asked him about the country’s history. He told me that during the anti-colonial movement to rid the country of the French, the scholars of al-Zaytuna University were very powerful indeed, but the single most unifying force was around the politician, Habib Bourguiba, and the scholars of al-Zaytuna debated long and hard whether or not to back Bourguiba, as he was an avowed secularist and had no commitment to the religion.
Shaykh Shadhili said that the scholars opted to support Bourguiba because they thought he would help the Tunisians oust the French, and they could deal with him thereafter. However, little did these scholars realize that Bourguiba would be worse than the French and would, in fact, turn against them before they could do anything about him. This seems to be the great lesson of revolutions and coups: With rare exceptions, they bring in new governments that are as bad or worse than the ones they ousted. The man who just fled from Tunisia to Jeddah had taken the government from a decrepit and delirious Bourguiba promising the Tunisians that the age of tyranny was over. Hah.
An intriguing aspect of the current Tunisian situation is the absence of ideology. This is a genuine uprising of people who are sick and tired of the corruption and cruelty of a state apparatus. Monarchs of old practiced the tradition of benevolence. They were not always benevolent but were raised with the understanding that they were there to serve the people. These pathetic Arab rulers who overthrew those monarchs practice the worst types of cronyism and nepotism, placing their sons on their “thrones,” and they thrive in an environment that is driven by family and tribal allegiance. The cracks have been showing for a while. And now, in Tunisia, it has all come tumbling down.
The lessons of history are worth heeding. Tunis, once called Carthage, had a mythical queen, Dido. According to legend, she killed herself on a funeral pyre due to her despair at being scorned by Aeneas, who abandoned her to Rome. The historical Hannibal led a Tunisian army to Rome to rid Tunis of Roman persecution, but he failed, and Rome’s vengeance led to the salting of the soil in Tunis and the destruction of Carthage that lies in ruins today near the capital. The Muslim world now has its share of misguided, petty Hannibals who think that by attacking Rome, they will restore the glory of “Carthage.” Yet, their attacks only provide the necessary excuses for the Empire to salt the soil of Iraq and Afghanistan.
***** ***** *****
While the Tunisian Dido didn’t accomplish anything through her suicide by fire, our poor green grocer, Mohamed Bouazizi, has ignited the Arab world in flames, achieving in death what he could not in life – sense of purpose and meaning – indubitably more than all the suicide bombers around the globe combined. His was an act of a desperate man who chose not to kill others but instead to light himself on fire in protest. This was the sacrificial tactic that Buddhist monks used during the Vietnam War, and their actions had a massive impact on the psyches of Westerners. When a situation becomes so desperate that people choose to leave the world rather than to stay in it and struggle, the message to the surviving ones is clear: it is time for a change. Well that change is happening in Egypt and other places in the Muslim world. Let’s hope for the best and pray for these poor, suffering people who deserve far better than their leaders have given them.
Suicide is rare in the Muslim world, but it’s increasing. God makes life generally bearable for people, so they will choose even highly difficult situations over the option of checking out. Hamlet’s famous soliloquy, which begins with “To be or not to be,” reminds us that in taking our own lives, we may be fleeing to troubles far greater than the ones prompting us to flee.
An odd aspect of the reaction to Bouazizi’s suicidal act is that some Muslims will surely condemn it, since suicide is clearly prohibited in Islam, but these same Muslims will justify the actions of suicide bombers, now euphemistically called “martyrdom operations” (‘amiliyyat istishhadiyyah) on Arabic newscasts. The justifiers point out that suicide bombing is an act of defense, and their only real weapon at that.
But the similarities and differences of a suicide and suicide bombing are worth contemplating. In Bouazizi’s mind, suicide was his only weapon of defense against an unjust Tunisian government that would neither listen to him nor even let him earn a livelihood selling vegetables without having to bribe some low-level official to get the piece of paper that would enable him to do so. A suicide bomber, as the social science studies show, is also in a similar state of despair, and straps bombs to himself so he can kill himself and other people about whom he knows nothing. The assumption the suicide bomber makes seems to be, “My life and my people’s lives are miserable, and no one is doing anything about it, so it might fix things if I sacrifice my life and take a bunch of other people’s lives too.” Hence, some people just being on an Israeli street corner become a target, irrespective of whether they support or oppose Israeli aggression against Palestinians. What makes such suicide bombing more honorable than Bouazizi’s suicide?
Suicide is suicide, it seems to me, but it becomes truly heinous when one decides to take others with him using indiscriminate methods of mass destruction. I cannot sit in judgment of the Palestinians who have resorted to such measures nor the Chechnyian women who lost husbands and children and in acts of savage revenge killed themselves and others. I am not in their shoes, and I cannot fathom the depth of their despair. However, I do not condone the act of suicide bombing or any form of suicide, as I consider both to be of the same ilk, and in fact the former is worse in my estimation due to the extended harm to others. And I do judge the notion that suicide bombers are somehow not really committing suicide (because they are taking the lives of others) yet our Tunisian green grocer deserves to go to hell because he is committing suicide. He is not seen as a martyr, but the suicide bombers are viewed as noble martyrs because along with their own lives they took some possibly innocent bystanders; hence, in this view, suicide bombers deserve a martyr’s honor and paradise. I must admit, I just don’t get it; I think those who promote this notion need to study Mizan al-amal and the other great texts of ethical theory in our tradition.
Like copycat suicide bombers who now proliferate all over the Muslim world, we are seeing copycat self-immolators in places like Egypt, Algeria, and even Mauritania. Dr. T. J. Winter said, “Suicide bombing is an extreme way of shooting oneself in the foot.” The Muslim world deserves better strategies for dealing with very real social issues as well as better leadership, clearly.
***** ***** *****
Though suicide is haram, the simple protest of this Tunisian street vendor did more to change the status quo and put real fear in the hearts of the tyrants than all of the suicide bombers. We must devise better and more civilized ways of dealing with our differences, as we live in an age of nuclear power, machine guns, aerial bombings, and global news cycles that expose us to the pain and suffering of peoples in far off places.
Many people in the West have no idea how much the Arab on the street suffers from humiliation under unjust rulers and their petty minions. I have a friend who is a beautiful young Arab man from the desert. Unlike some of his compatriots who come to the West and have promiscuous relationships, he chose to honorably marry an American woman while he was studying here. Now, upon returning to his homeland, he is struggling to get a visa for her, as his country does not allow its citizens to marry outside their land without first obtaining permission from the ministry of interior. He now simply waits for the whim of some petty bureaucrat to issue his wife a visa so that she can join her husband and meet his family.
Like our green grocer, people can only take so much.
The great American novelist, writer, and poet, Langston Hughes, wrote:
What happens to a dream deferred?
Does it dry up
Like a raisin in the sun?
Or fester like a sore…
And then run?
Does it stink like rotten meat?
Or crust and sugar over…
like a syrupy sweet?
Maybe it just sags
like a heavy load.
Or does it explode?
Our green grocer went to university with dreams; but his dreams did not materialize, and so in desperation he turned to selling vegetables to earn an honorable livelihood. Yet he was not allowed even to fulfill that pitiful deferred dream. They should have just let the man sell his vegetables, but they didn’t, and the fire was lit. Already those flames have spread to Egypt, and we watch with fear and trepidation for the well-being of our Egyptian brothers and sisters, hoping and praying for their future and that of Egypt, the heart of the Arab world, which now is engulfed in the bonfire of revolution.
Post Script:
Sorry for the delay in posting a blog. If you knew why, you would sympathize. I really appreciate the prayers and well wishes so many of you expressed. Thank you and God bless you. Please pray for our brothers and sisters in Jeddah also who are suffering from devastating rainfalls that have left many homeless.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Salam,
It appears Mubarak has left. Everyone make Duah for Egypt and the Egyptian people that what lies ahead is better.
Salam
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Assalamu Aleikum Shaykh Hamza,
Thank you for your words!!! Again you make everything so clear. I lived in Egypt for 10 years and witnessed all that you have mentioned and heard a thousand other sad and horrible stories.
I pray to Allah to bless you and give you and your family everything kheir- for every hour you have studied, for every person you have listened to for all the knowledge that you have shared, for every mile you have traveled to connect with people with all your heart and soul and for the sake of Allah. AMEEN
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Salam,
That a “suicide bomber, as the social science studies show, is also in a similar state of despair …” is simply untrue. Recent empirical studies, like Chicago political scientist Pape (Cutting the Fuse) and others, have repeatedly shown, that despair is not an element that propels suicide bombers.
The argument above is flawed at many levels. The comparison of suicide bombing and suicide in desperation is made from a very narrow perspective. I happen to believe that all suicide is wrong, but can find all kinds of argument that resistance based suicide may be superior to suicide of desperation. Other than political usefulness of such an argument in the US (economic suicide can be appreciated if not mythicized, but not ones targeted against Israel and the US), I find little moral or Islamic justification for such a comparison. There are hundreds of people committing suicide out of desperation in Egypt and elsewhere, none led to a revolution. That the Tunisians responded is to be attributed to the grace and inscrutable of Allah, and then the response of those who acted in hope of change, not the desperation of Bouazizi.
Such acts of self-immolation have sharply risen in the Muslim world because of this empty romanticism and valorization. The Prophet alaihissalam says that Allah aides this religion by means of people who have no good in them (innallah yu`ayyid hadhal din bi rajul fajir aw bi qawmin la khalaqa lahum).
Let us thank God and celebrate those who responded in the way of the Prophet alaihissalam and the best of his followers by trusting in God and speaking truth to power, and not those who chose otherwise, and may God forgive all.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Salam dear Shaykh Hamza,
I am a Tunisian and for once in my life I can honestly say that I am proud of my fellow Tunisians that they stood up against the tyrant Ben Ali and his criminal in-law Trabelsi family.
Now that Ben Ali escaped the country we see that the situation for Muslims who want to practice our din improved immensely. The masajid are open again, all the time, and not like before just 20 mins to pray the salat and closed directly after that. Sheikh Rachid al-Ghannouchi who lived 19 years in exile in Londen returned two our country two weeks ago and was greeted by thousands of supporters who were waiting for him and other imam’s who lived in exile. While waiting for them at Carthage airport in Tunis they were doing dhikr out loud en saying takbir. This would have never been possible two months ago while Ben Ali was still in power.
Rachid al-Ghannouchi is the president of the Islamic party an-Nahda and a graduate from Zaitouna University (the famous one) in the 60′s when it still had a good reputation and before Bourguiba and later Ben Ali changed the whole curriculum. He prayed as an imam already in the Zaitouna mosque in Tunis which means change has come and will further improve bit by bit with the will of Allah.
We see imam’s in the masajid who are talking about anything now without fear or any hesitation. We see imam’s in the masajid who are appointed by the masajid themselves based on their reputation and/or knowledge. We see that the people who come to the masajid are eager to hear the imam talking about the country, where it should go to and what Islam asks of us whereas before the imam would often just read out the khotba and people came more often just to pray. Just as the previous government wanted.
I hope you will get the chance to visit our country again in the following years, inchallah, and it would be beautiful if you would give a speech. Your welcome at any time ya sidi and we would be more then glad to host you “fi tounes jedida”.
Ma’a salama.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Jazakallahu khair for this blog Sheikh Hamza. What do you make of the violence in Egypt right now? Why are the Muslims leaders in Egypt not calling on all Egyptian Muslims to unite, reminding them that ultimately they are fighting and killing their own Muslim brothers and sisters. Where is the sense in that? Have they forgotten their return is to AllahSWT? Who is going to remind them? I really feel for them esp. the women and children. May AllahSWT make justice prevail and help the Egyptian people to turn to AllahSWT.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
SA Skh Hamza,
I’m Reading your blog now from Egypt, amidst a revolution ongoing.
Please make duaa for us that things will turn out for the better…
People here are really suffering as they try to change this corrput regime.
Hasbuna Allah Wa Ne3m Al Wakeel.
Sherif,
Cairo Egypt.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Asalamualaikum Sh Hamza,
I’m amazed at what I’m seeing at the Global level. It seems that Samuel Huntington was somewhat right in “Clash of Civilizations”, when he said that Muslim countries would be ripe for revolution in the early decades of the 21st century.
I’d love to hear your thoughts on where you see the Ummah over the next 30-40 years. Where do you see this all going? Have they found the gold at the bottom of the Euphrates? It seems to me sometimes that everything is spinning, and I’m too dizzy to understand reality anymore.
May Allah grant you success in this world, and in the Next. Ameen!
Munawar
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Jazakamullah Shiekh, as always very helpfull in these times.
Abdul Hadi, UK
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
As Salamu Alaykum Dearest Shaykh,
I have greatly benefited and eventually converted over 2 years ago, after listening to your talks and reading your books over the years. I would like to take time to tell you how much I have learned from you, and still ‘sit at your feet’ to honor you as my teacher and mentor… and I quote you almost daily on topics relating to Islam. But today I am heavy of heart as a Mother. Your statement: “Many people in the West have no idea how much the Arab on the street suffers from humiliation under unjust rulers and their petty minions. I have a friend who is a beautiful young Arab man from the desert. Unlike some of his compatriots who come to the West and have promiscuous relationships, he chose to honorably marry an American woman while he was studying here. Now, upon returning to his homeland, he is struggling to get a visa for her, as his country does allow its citizens to marry outside their land without first obtaining permission from the government. He now simply waits for the whim of some petty bureaucrat to issue his wife a visa so that she can join her husband and meet his family.”
It is happening to me and my family now, as U.S. citizens, and our family is so worried about my son’s civil rights being violated by his own country as he is being profiled by the U.S. Embassy in Malaysia. My son is a Euro-American citizen, born and raised here in the U.S. He converted to Islam over 9 years ago, much as yourself, at the age of 17, approximately, and has been a devoted scholar even learning Arabic on his own, in the rural midwest at his family home. His dream had been to attend Dar Al Mustafa, in Tarim someday. Since he was not fluent in Arabic at that time, he deferred his dream to attend this esteem school, and instead he attended a school in Malaysia. At that time, age 26, he married a Malaysian woman of the highest deen and education in Islamic knowledge/teachings. I am a single mom, and social worker, struggling to support my son in his religious education, so he was never able to live in such a way to afford decent health care there, or living arrangements, and lived a simple life w/many many hardships. He finally was able to attend a school in Feb 09, in Tarim…one affiliated with Dar Al Mustafa. He attended for 9 months until he became too ill from a parasitic condition that left him weak and very ill, so he and his wife had to return to the home of her parents in Malaysia in Oct O9. He has struggled to find a good school there in Malaysia that we could afford, to continue his religious studies. The schools there he attended, in Malaysia, are not helpful in assisting the students in acquiring their student visas so my son had to worry constantly about how he was going to do that on his tourist visa. In the meantime, Allah ta ala has blessed them with a child recently, and a good school FINALLY, that will help him attain a student visa….but, the U.S. Embassy recently kept his passport when he recently went there for more pages, and is investigating him, i suppose, since they are not returning it promptly in order for him to keep up his immigration status. They now want to “re-interview” him next week and he fears they will profile him, and interrogate him w/o legal representation. How can they do this?? they can….We are deeply concerned. My son is a studious bookworm, without much financial means, who just wants to complete his studies in peace with his wife and baby son. Your Arab friend’s situation is difficult, but it is happening to American Muslims in other lands at U.S. Embassies. Against the drumbeat of U.S. Republicans such as Rep Peter King, younger American Muslim men are being profiled as radicals, and their rights are being violated. The case of the young man in Kuwait, who was recently tortured by our govt, haunts me, as a mother….Please help us….
Wassalam,
Maryam-Hajar
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Dear Shaykh Hamza,
Subhan Allah, I came across something just a few nights ago that was so perfect in timing, message, and the author’s own background that I felt it’s most appropriate to share on your blog, especially since you are so connected to the people – past and present – of Fes.
In John Renard’s introduction to his translation of Ibn Abbad of Ronda’s, “Letters on the Sufi Path,” Renard discusses Ibn Abbad’s, may Allah have mercy on him, understanding of history. There are a few paragraphs that just amaze me when I read them. I would like to share..
“Ibn ‘Abbad manages to hold on to the hope of renewal somewhat more firmly. He is steadfast in his confidence that God is the Lord of History. What he sees around him does not make him happy, but economic and political forces are not what ultimately determine the destiny of society and the world. Governments may come unglued, princes may be dissolute, soldiers may desert their posts, but so long as there is a grain of faith in someone’s hear, all is not lost. Ibn ‘Abbad focuses his critique on the religious leaders, the jurists who have become too comfortable in their enclaves, who have forgotten the real needs of ordinary people, and who have taken the inviolability of caste privilege too much for granted He sounds the alarm for the priority of reform in religion:
Reform on the temporal level depends on religious reform; reform of the moral of princes depends on this and on reforms of teachers of the Revelaed Law. But the jurists will reform only if God removes laziness and torpor from their hearts. Then they would open their eyes to the world they live in, with its disorders and deficiencies. The could sound the depths of evil there, and would set about the primary concern, namely, that which can renew the morals of the people and those they direct (Renard, 11).”
I’ve never heard of Ibn ‘Abbad until a friend told me about him only a few weeks ago. I found the translation of his letters and started reading and at the same was reading about the revolutions taking place in the middle east. I can’t help but say subhan Allah! It was only an increase in faith for me in Allah’s Will and Power, and I hope sharing that entry will benefit others like it did for me. I encourage anyone to read about the life of Ibn ‘Abbad and take an example from it. Perhaps you could help us learn more about him and his teachings. Here is a link to more information on him for those interested.
http://www.dar-sirr.com/Rundi.html
Finally, here is something else I found amazing in the introduction. “Ibn ‘Abbad never thinks of the need for reform on the macrocosmic level, that of society and community, without also being intensely aware of the need for a corresponding renewal on the part of the individual (13).”
I think that is something we all can focus on, insha Allah..
My friend also told me that Ibn ‘Abbad, raDiya ALlahu ‘anhu, is buried in Fes but his grave is in bad shape. She also said that it is not safe to go there. Do you know if this is true? If so, is there anything that can be done to fix that making it easier to visit him? I thought you may be able to help, insha’ Allah, since you are connected to people in Morocco.
Baarak Allah feekum for all your efforts! May Allah give you and your family all good in this world and the next. May al-Rahman, al-Raheem have mercy on the ummah of His habeeb, alayhi as-salaat was salaam.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Asalam’alaikum Shaykh Hamza -
I mean no disrespect with my following message, but as I read through this post, I’m troubled by a number of things and would like to bring some of them to your attention (and to other readers as well). Perhaps your post is just musings/ramblings, but it does not seem to have a clear message and is plagued by unsupported points and oversimplified conclusions.
Your take on revolutions, namely this notion that, “With rare exceptions, [revolutions] bring in new governments that are as bad or worse than the ones they ousted.” is historically inaccurate (I believe a quick Google search on ‘revolutions’ will present that is simply not true – America being an obvious example) and an absurd reduction of a very complex issue. Revolutions are not to be viewed simply as what the new regime would eventually become, nor is their success/failure measured simply by how oppressive a regime is to a particular group of Islamic scholars. This is a very complicated issue and to attempt to reduce it to a few dismissive lines is scholastically unjust – perhaps taking a look at the works by Hannah Arendt, along with other political thinkers might provides some enlightenment on the subject. On a side note, I find it rather troubling that you seem to reduce fighting against French occupation to a simple, condescending ‘hah’.
Secondly, while you continuously point out that suicide is indeed haram in Islam, the bulk of your post seems to be putting Bouazizi on a pedestal, as if his form of suicide was more acceptable than what we are used to hearing about in regards to Muslims. Your account of his tale and impact makes him sound rather heroic, as if your able to pass moral and ethical judgement on what types of suicide are more productive for the Muslim ummah at large. Furthermore, the analogy you make to Thích Quảng Đức in Vietnam is again an oversimplification and a false analogy on a number of levels, from international relations to the fact that lighting oneself on fire was a Buddist tradition long before 1963. This lack of understanding about international relations and US foreign policies seems to also pervade other comments such as, “Yet, their attacks only provide the necessary excuses for the Empire to salt the soil of Iraq and Afghanistan.”
I bring these few points to your attention simply because I believe that someone of your influence should be more careful when commenting on such sensitive and monumental issues that have gripped the world. Unfortunately, the great majority of Muslims do not take advantage of their educational opportunities and turn to prominent Muslim figures for their information on all issues, even if they are not traditionally Islamic ones and hence not the area of the scholars’ expertise. Furthermore, many Muslims are often impressed by pseudo-intellectualism, when poets, authors, and thinkers are quoted to serve a point, rather than focusing on the root of the argument and the point that is actually being made. I hope that those who come and read this blog also take the time to truly educate themselves on history and take to learning about the comments you make in your posts. In sha’ Allah you can use your influence to help Muslims cure their problem of ignorance, not just of Islamic sciences, but academic ones as well.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
barakallahu feeka. May ALLAH continue to guide you and bless you with the best of dunya n akhirah ameen
akhuka
south africa
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Dear Hamza Yusuf,
I did enjoy your analysis detailing how the act of lesser violence of Mohammad Bouazizi was much more successful in the grander scheme of things than the hundreds of suicide bombers which the middle east has witnessed.
Still, I am wondering if you are not drawing a bit of a strawman argument by stating that there will be Muslims who condemn Bouaziz while praising other suicide bombers simply because I have not heard any religious figure in the Arab world making that claim.
Also, I find it perplexing that you would then, in some ways, find honour in the acts of Bouazizi while condemning other suicide bomber and criticize those who do the opposite. From an Usuli perspective, shouldn’t we either condemn both actions or find legitimacy in both? (That is, unless one decides to condemn suicide bombings for its extrinsic qualities – namely killing of innocent bystanders).
Your comments on the history of Tunisia are especially interesting since they are analogous to the history of Egypt as well, where protests have also taken off. All we can do is pray that Allah rectifies the affairs of this nation. Ameen.
- Ibrahim, Canada
Hamza Yusuf Posted on 04/15/2011
Thank you for the comment. I was not in any way suggesting any approbation of Bouazizi’s suicide. I made it clear that it is condemned by Sharia’. My point is that while one is lionized by some Muslims i.e. suicide bombings, the other is demonized. I feel we need to be consistent and condemn all forms of suicide and indiscriminate murder.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
jazakallahu khayr for writing this, its very important for the Muslim scholarship in this country to offer their commentary and viewpoints on current events, especially those affecting Muslims.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Jazakum Allahu Khayrun Sidi Hamza,
One can only feel sympathy for the many years of oppression placed upon the Tunisians and Egyptians, as well as all other Muslim countries, beneath the feet of the modern day Pharoahs or Neros, interestingly allowed lifelines by our very own country: America.
Do you not find it astonishing, at least in theory, that the American government hesitates to stand against a dictator like Mubarak as its people suffer?
I can only remember the brave stories of Paul Revere I heard as a child, and how we were taught the myth of noble American forefathers violently clashing with brutal British taxers who sought to exploit the riches of America…
Yet, this same country that prides itself on love for liberty and freedom, is so willing to dismiss such freedoms for Egypt … even if it is by peaceful means!
Your Brother,
Ata
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Dear Sheikh Hamza,
Salams,
I hope and pray you are feeling better, your voice means a lot to us.
I am an Egyptian who has immigrated to Canada. Like most other Egyptians, I have been glued to Al-Jazeera since Thursday. It was wonderful at the beginning to watch Egyptians do what was thought they would never do, to feel proud of Egypt for something in its present and not just its past. It was a feeling I had missed for so long I had forgotten what it felt like.
Now I am fearful for Egypt’s future and mad that Israel’s security and the spectre of an Islamist government is more important to the West, particularly the US. I see Mubarak putting in place a clone before he flees. I know in some years I will be reading a book by a Robert Fisk-like journalist who tells us just how involved the US was in orchestrating the changes to its benefit.
I pray, I attend rallies, I write letter to politicians. Today it occurred to me that it would be more helpful to Egypt if I unglued myself from Al-Jazeera and listened and responded to fears of Egypt being the next Iran in the Western media. What more can I do?
Sincerely,
LE
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
I love reading your writing. May Allah bless you.
Abdurrahman Mihirig Posted on 04/15/2011
Salam,
As you said, in the past it has certainly led to a much worse situation. I am from Libya, and the history has demonstrated what happened there… Protesters, who were secularist, socialist, communist, nasserist, and otherwise, used to chant in the streets “Iblis wa la Idris!” – in other words, ‘We’d rather have Iblis (satan) than King Idris’ – they certainly got it, and Qaddafi would make jokes in the future saying “When I want to relax, I go to Jahannam” – jahannam being the name of his actual retreat.
The first thing Qaddafi did when he took over was shut down libya’s only islamic university, al jami3a al sanusiya in the city of al-bayda – which created a vacuum of religious authority in libya, and opened the doors to extremism, and other imported forms of islam from najd and other wise.
in any case, I have a lot of sympathy for bouazizi. and hardly any for those who blow themselves up, and even less respect for those who support it by saying its a “dharura” – (it’s interesting to note that in every other circumstance they will reject fiqhi principles on the basis that they aren’t hadiths)
finally, I really pray for the best for the people of Egypt and Tunisia, and all Muslims. if they manage to free themselves, then perhaps the rest of the arab countries are close behind.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
A very profound and true article, once again it is a pleasure to read Sh. Hamza Yusuf. May Allah reward him for all that he has done for Islam in America. Amin
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Jazakullah khair Shaykh. As always, you have great insight and perspective.
May Allah, ta’ala, clear the minds and purify the hearts of our Muslim ummah. May He, ta’ala, replace corruption and oppression with justice and concern. May we as Muslims, remember in our day to day dealings, the prophetic example that Allah, ta’ala, was generous and merciful enough to bestow on us, Amin.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
What it comes down to, I feel, is glory. Suicide bombing is seen as full of glory because it supposedly takes down the ‘enemy.’ But a green grocer who is pitiful and invisible is not full of glory. I think Muslims need to get beyond theatrics in determining what act is moral and what isn’t.
It is reported that Bouazizi said, “If you don’t see me I’ll burn myself.”
Now we see him.
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
May Allah bless you Shaykh Hamza for all your efforts, and for being a voice of sanity and reason. I share your cautious attitude toward these ‘revolutions’… who’s to say they won’t usher in yet another 30 years of dictatorship? Until our hearts and way of thinking change, humanity cannot do what is right.
I will make du’a for you and for Zaytuna College to become everything you want it to be and more insha Allah.
Omar, UK
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Dear Hamza Yusuf,
Thank you for the wonderful article. Like you and most rational people, I also don’t understand the rationale behind suicide bombings. You say: “I must admit, I just don’t get it; I think those who promote this notion need to study Mizan al-amal and the other great texts of ethical theory in our tradition.” I realize you say this in reference to people who are disgruntled with their political situation, but we also know that people do the same in the name of religion.
In addition to what Mizan al-amal, people should consider studying the writings of the divinely appointed Imam of this age. He emphatically denounced the jihad of the sword in this age, “The religion that can easily establish its truth and superiority by sound intellectual arguments, heavenly signs or other reliable testimony, does not need the sword to threaten men and force a confession of its truth from them. Religion is worth the name only so long as it is in consonance with reason. If it fails to satisfy that requisite, if it has to make up for its discomfiture in argument by handling the sword, it needs no other argument for its falsification. The sword it wields cuts its own throat before reaching others.”
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
JazakAllahu Khayr Shaykh Hamza, may Khayr come out of such a situation, Ameen
Anonymous Posted on 04/15/2011
Mashallah Sh. Hamza. Good things are always worth waiting for. The quality of your blogs are so good, the time inbetween them makes no difference